Table header?
Discussion and feedback about Discourse
Stars were used that way but they opted to remove stars because they were functionally similar to bookmarks and only confused people. As well having two things people didnāt use a lot is hard to validate. This way they can optimize one usage.
@OneEightZero Table header would be the table description header that lists what the columns are and allows sorting for those columns.
Removing the table headers is fine when itās self evident what the content is in each column.
What do you think of this?
Basically the bookmark icon on the left links to the first bookmark, and if you have multiple it shows the bookmark list below.
I am not a fan of how much space it adds, but I can see it being useful.
It seems reasonable. I guess people would only use bookmarks for things they really want to keep track of and then itās worth a little bit of extra space.
I was curious how bookmarks actually worked on this site. How is it better than post tracking?
Bookmarks are for marking a post/topic for easy reference later. On our forum it might not be that useful, but letās say there is a topic with a helpful guide, you may want to bookmark it for easy access later.
That is how I assume people would use it.
Whatās the size limit for avatars? I couldnāt find it noted anywhere, I mightāve missed it.
I think it is limited by file size which is like 3mb, but I would have to check in the code I believe.
It gets resized automatically.
Can we have options for image/animated file resizing please?
Heavily dislike everything being auto-miniaturised on my screen.
Well youāre talking about images posted in posts, and not avatars.
That is a larger problem due to how Discourse is made and how it assumes things will work. It is a combination of JS and Ruby changes to make it work better. Beyond what Iāve had time to look into, but it is something Iāve been thinking about and wanting to tackle.
Cool beans.
Iāve made no assumption as to the taskās difficulty tbh. Iād imagine that it would effect the way the forum currently has a fixed width in order to accommodate larger images?
Yes, Discourse has assumptions to how it should work, but I feel there may be better ways to handle it. I could at the very least, strip out their implementation and put in my own, and/or enhance their implementation to be more responsive and fit the screen better.
Ideally the image should take up most of the available width (within the max width of the page already set) and have a set max height (to avoid super long images dominating the page). It should be at good enough quality to be readable and obviously on click you should be able to see the full size image. If the image is smaller than the size of the width, it should be as big as it is.
Only comment I have is that the threads listed in the Suggest Topics below no longer display which area of the forum theyāre from (Gaming, On-Topic etc.).
This loads infinite times faster. I kept having to come to this thread and reclicking the link whenever I moved to multiple computers. Iām so glad itās been updated globally.
Iām in continuous awe over your work, Chapel. Thank you for such a great site.